BTC$68,420▲ 0.82% / ETH$3,841▼ 0.31% / LTC$94.05▲ 1.14% / SOL$221.60▲ 3.02% / USDT·TRC20$1.0000 / USDC·ERC20$0.9999 / XMR$168.42▼ 0.18% / TON$6.02▲ 0.47% / XRP$2.41▼ 0.09% / GAS·ETH18 gwei / Indicative prices · illustrative ticker / No-KYC · non-pooled · 0.4% flat / BTC$68,420▲ 0.82% / ETH$3,841▼ 0.31% / LTC$94.05▲ 1.14% / SOL$221.60▲ 3.02% / USDT·TRC20$1.0000 / USDC·ERC20$0.9999 / XMR$168.42▼ 0.18% / TON$6.02▲ 0.47% / XRP$2.41▼ 0.09% / GAS·ETH18 gwei / Indicative prices · illustrative ticker / No-KYC · non-pooled · 0.4% flat
OrbChain
UTC 18:47:02 Get started →
§ Product · 2026-08-17

Payment events,
everywhere else.

Most of what happens after a payment isn't payment logic at all: a row in a revenue sheet, a Slack ping, a CRM deal marked won, an onboarding email. None of it deserves a deployed webhook service — it deserves a Zap. Here's how OrbChain events flow into Zapier's 6000+ apps and Make's scenario engine, and the raw-webhook route that works even without the apps.

The trigger/action surface

Both the Zapier app and the Make app expose the same integration surface. Triggers: payment lifecycle (payment.paid, pending, failed), payout.confirmed, and subscription events. Actions: create a payment, create a payout, read balances — enough to not just react to money but move it from inside an automation. Connection is one paste of an API key (mint a scoped one: read-only for reporting Zaps, payment:create only if a Zap creates invoices).

Honest status note: both apps are currently in the platforms' private-invite review stage — email us with your Zapier or Make account address and you get an invite link; public marketplace listings follow the platforms' review timelines. The invite version is the full app, not a beta build.

Recipes that pay for the setup time

  • Revenue sheet: payment.paid → append row to Google Sheets with amount, coin, USD value, order ID. The finance visibility most small teams are missing, built in four minutes.
  • Sales bell: payment.paid → Slack/Discord message. Morale infrastructure; do not underestimate it.
  • CRM hygiene: payment paid → mark the HubSpot/Pipedrive deal won; payment.failed → task for a follow-up.
  • Fulfillment: paid → send the license key / add to the members group / trigger the shipping app — the whole reason many stores wanted webhooks in the first place, minus the webhook server.
  • Dunning assist: subscription events → email sequences in your ESP, complementing the platform's own invoice emails.

The fallback that works today: raw webhooks

Zapier's "Webhooks by Zapier" trigger and Make's webhook module can ingest OrbChain's signed webhooks directly — point your webhook URL (or a per-key webhook override, so your main endpoint keeps working) at the catch-hook URL and every field of the event payload becomes mappable in your automation. You lose the polished trigger UX and gain zero waiting: this path needs no invite and works right now. One caution — a no-code catch hook won't verify the HMAC signature, so treat data arriving this way as a convenience feed for sheets-and-pings, and keep anything that grants value (license issuance, account credit) behind a verified handler or the official app.

Where no-code should stop

The boundary worth respecting: automations that record and notify belong in Zapier/Make; logic that decides and credits belongs behind HMAC verification and event_id dedup in real code — or at minimum in the official app, which handles verification for you. Most businesses land on both: the Zap posts to Slack and the sheet, the webhook handler does the crediting, and neither knows about the other.

§ Keep reading

Related posts.

Hand-picked
Same rails, next questions